Health Insurance Trends
The PBM Challenge in Today's Market
With Mployer's Insights+ platform, employers can now evaluate their 401(k) offering with the same rigor as salary benchmarking, leading to a powerful edge in recruiting and retention.
June 16, 2025

The PBM Challenge in Today's Market

(An easy to understand guide)

Prescription drug costs have surged dramatically in recent years, placing increasing strain on employer-sponsored health plans. Between 2000 and 2020, retail prescription drug spending in the U.S. nearly doubled (a 91% increase) and continues to climb—outpacing most other healthcare cost categories. The rise stems from two primary factors: expensive new specialty therapies (like weight-loss and biologic treatments) and the opaque role of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) in setting prices. What makes matters worse is that Americans pay dramatically more than people in other high-income nations—U.S. drug prices average 2.78 times higher than in 33 comparable countries, and brand-name drugs can cost more than four times as much. This steep cost trajectory and global overpayment emphasize why understanding and managing PBMs has become essential for employers aiming to control healthcare spend and protect employees.

How PBMs Actually Work

When an employer designs its health plan, it either chooses a PBM directly or selects a carrier that already has a PBM embedded in its plan. From there, the PBM takes control of the prescription drug benefit. They build the formulary—the list of drugs that are covered—and negotiate with manufacturers to decide which drugs make the list. By narrowing coverage to certain products, PBMs gain leverage to demand better deals. They also restrict which pharmacies are in-network, again concentrating volume to maximize bargaining power.

This means PBMs effectively set the market, costs, and tiers employees experience: whether a drug falls into Tier 1 with a $10 copay or Tier 4 with a 25% coinsurance is dictated by the PBM’s design. On the back end, PBMs collect rebates from drug makers. A rebate is essentially a kickback payment from the manufacturer to the PBM, offered in exchange for favorable placement of a drug on the formulary or higher expected utilization. For example, if two similar drugs treat the same condition, the manufacturer willing to pay a higher rebate is more likely to have their drug chosen. Some portion of these rebates is passed back to the employer to lower plan costs, but a significant share is often kept by the PBM—one of the biggest transparency concerns in the system

How Drug Tiers and Payment Structures Work

Most employer health plans organize prescription coverage into tiers, which determine both access and cost-sharing for employees.

  • Tier 1 (Generics): Lowest-cost drugs, usually just a $10–$20 copay. They are widely accessible and often encouraged as first-line therapy.
  • Tier 2 (Preferred Brands): Brand-name drugs that PBMs have negotiated discounts on. Employees typically pay $30–$50 copays or around 20% coinsurance.
  • Tier 3 (Non-Preferred Brands): Higher-cost brand drugs not favored on the formulary. Employees may owe 40%+ coinsurance, leading to hundreds in out-of-pocket costs.
  • Tier 4 (Specialty Drugs): High-cost therapies for serious conditions like cancer or hemophilia. These usually require coinsurance (20–30%), which can mean thousands of dollars per month. Although they make up less than 2% of prescriptions, specialty drugs drive nearly half of total drug spending.

Copays vs. Coinsurance

  • A copay is a fixed, predictable dollar amount per prescription.
  • Coinsurance is a percentage of the total drug cost until the deductible or out-of-pocket maximum is reached. While it helps share costs, it creates unpredictability—especially for specialty drugs, where 25% coinsurance could mean $250 on a $1,000 medication or much more on therapies costing thousands each month.

For employers, understanding how tiers and cost-sharing are structured is critical, since they directly affect both plan expenses and employee affordability.


High-Cost Drugs and Their Outsized Impact

While high-cost drugs represent only a small fraction of total prescriptions, their impact on employer health plans is staggering. Specialty medications—such as those for cancer, hemophilia, and autoimmune disorders—account for less than 2% of prescriptions but drive close to 50% of all drug spending. Their costs have grown at double-digit rates year over year, fueled by new biologics, gene therapies, and infusion-based treatments that can run into hundreds of thousands of dollars annually. According to Sun Life’s High-Cost Claims Report, in many catastrophic claim categories like hemophilia or leukemia, prescription drugs make up more than 90% of the total cost of care. For employers, this means a single claimant on a specialty drug can dramatically shift overall plan spend, making pharmacy benefits one of the most volatile and financially significant areas to manage.

How Carriers Handle High-Cost Drugs

Carriers cover most FDA-approved specialty drugs but tightly manage access and cost. They use formularies to decide which drugs are included (and on what tier), require prior authorization or step therapy before approving treatment, and often restrict dispensing to their own specialty pharmacy networks. Coverage is generally limited to drugs deemed medically necessary, while experimental or non-formulary drugs are excluded unless appealed. For employees, this can mean higher coinsurance, delays in approval, and fewer choices on where prescriptions can be filled.

Who Controls the PBM Market—and Who’s Challenging It

Today, most carriers are tied to the “Big Three” PBMs, which together control more than 75% of the market:
  • Aetna/CVS → CVS Caremark
  • Cigna → Express Scripts
  • UnitedHealthcare → OptumRx
  • Anthem/Blue Cross (varies by region) → Caremark or Express Scripts

This consolidation means that for many employers, pharmacy benefits are automatically bundled with one of these large PBMs, leaving little room for visibility or flexibility.  

The remaining 25% is made up of disruptors offering more transparent models. Players like SmithRx (pass-through pricing with detailed reporting), MedOne (independent PBM with customizable formularies and full rebate pass-through), and Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus Drugs (a direct-to-consumer model selling drugs at cost plus a small margin) are challenging the status quo. For employers, knowing which PBM their carrier relies on—and whether a carve-out to one of these disruptors is possible—can be a critical step in controlling pharmacy costs.

Legislation and Reform Efforts

In recent years, lawmakers have increasingly targeted the opaque practices of PBMs, introducing multiple federal bills like the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act (S. 127, 2023) and the PBM Transparency Act of 2025 (S. 526). These aim to ban spread pricing, require full rebate pass-through, and mandate detailed reporting—but none have passed into law yet. Similarly, a 2025 House bill dubbed the PBM Reform Act proposes greater transparency around Medicare Part D contracts and delinking PBM compensation from drug prices, but it remains pending in committee.

At the state level, all 50 states have enacted some degree of PBM regulation. Few states have gone further: for example, Iowa is considering a law imposing minimum pharmacy dispensing fees, and Arkansas passed legislation curbing PBMs’ ownership of pharmacies—though that law has been temporarily blocked by a federal judge

In short: there's plenty of activity at both federal and state levels—but no sweeping reforms have become law yet, leaving employers to manage PBM challenges proactively on their own.

Be Educated: Key Questions to Ask Your Broker

  1. Who is our PBM, and is it bundled with our carrier?
  1. Do we receive 100% of rebates, or are they retained?
  1. Can we carve out our PBM given our size and funding model?
  1. Which high-cost drugs are driving our spend?
  1. Do we get claim-level reporting from our PBM? (often not)
  1. What specialty drug management strategies are in place?
  1. How does our plan compare to industry peers?

Closing Thoughts

Prescription drug costs are no longer a side issue—they’re a central driver of employer healthcare spend. The combination of high-cost specialty therapies and the opaque role PBMs play in setting formularies, controlling access, and managing rebates makes this one of the most complex and consequential areas of benefit management. For employers, the path forward starts with awareness: knowing which PBM you’re tied to, how rebates flow, which drugs are shaping your spend, and what levers you have to push for transparency or carve out alternatives.

While legislation at the federal and state levels may eventually bring more clarity and accountability to the PBM market, employers cannot afford to wait. By asking sharper questions, exploring disruptive PBM models, and partnering with brokers who understand this space, employers can take meaningful steps today to control costs and support employees more effectively.

Bottom line: Prescription drug costs are only going up. Employers that engage now—by digging into the details and holding PBMs and carriers accountable—will be best positioned to protect both their budgets and their people.

401(k) & Retirement
Does Your 401(k) Plan Stack Up?
With Mployer's Insights+ platform, employers can now evaluate their 401(k) offering with the same rigor as salary benchmarking, leading to a powerful edge in recruiting and retention.
June 16, 2025

Does Your 401(k) Plan Stack Up? Why Retirement Benefits Are the Quiet Power Player in Talent Strategy

Key Takeaways

  • Employers often overestimate the competitiveness of their 401(k) plans, while employees increasingly factor retirement benefits into job decisions.
  • Match percentages alone don’t tell the whole story; vesting, plan design, admin fees, and investment performance all shape true plan value.
  • Mployer has created the only solution that benchmarks retirement plans across 25,000+ designs, giving you a clear, data-backed rating.
  • The top quartile of employers contribute nearly 2.3x more annually than the bottom quartile, and they outperform in participation and retention.
  • With Insights+, employers can now evaluate their 401(k) offering with the same rigor as salary benchmarking, leading to a powerful edge in recruiting and retention.

The Strategic Blind Spot: Retirement Plan Competitiveness

Ask a benefits leader if their 401(k) plan is competitive and you’ll hear a confident “yes.” But ask based on what and the answers become fuzzier.

Most employers assess retirement benefits by match rate or overall offering (“we have one, so we’re good”). But match percentage is just the tip of the iceberg. The truth is, retirement plan competitiveness is shaped by a complex set of variables, many of which fly under the radar for a lot of employees.

From vesting schedules and administrative fees to plan flexibility and participation rates, the design of your 401(k) can quietly impact:

  • Retention among mid- and late-tenure employees
  • Offer acceptance among experienced candidates
  • Total rewards perception and employee satisfaction

And yet, few employers are equipped to quantify how their plan performs relative to the market.

Until now.

Introducing Mployer Insights+: The First 401(k) Benchmarking Solution for Employers

Mployer’s Insights+ platform is the only system that allows you to benchmark your retirement benefits with meaningful accuracy and market alignment.

Unlike outdated surveys or generic industry reports, Insights+ uses a 25,000+ plan dataset and proprietary scoring methodology to rate your retirement plan against your peers - by size, industry, and region.

We analyze not just what you offer, but how it performs across four core categories:

  • Employer Contributions
  • Plan Design & Features
  • Administrative Costs & Investment Returns
  • Employee Participation & Utilization

The result? A retirement plan competitiveness score that gives you the confidence and clarity to know exactly where you stand.

Why Match Rate Isn’t Enough

Let’s look at two hypothetical employers:

Company A looks generous on paper, but if employees don’t stay long enough to vest, or the plan underperforms after fees, the realized value is far lower.

Insights+ makes these trade-offs visible, quantifiable, and actionable.

What the Data Tells Us

According to the 2025 Mployer dataset:

  • The average employer contribution is $1,286 per employee per year.
  • But top-performing employers contribute over $2,900 annually, which is more than double the market median.
  • 35% of plans still use vesting schedules that delay employee ownership of employer contributions.
  • Administrative fees vary widely from 12.7 to 82.5 basis points, while 1-year returns range from 11% to 16%, depending on plan design.
  • Only 21% of plans use auto-enrollment, despite its proven effect on participation rates.

Participation rates reflect this disparity:

  • Bottom quartile: 74%
  • Top quartile: 94%


Retirement Benefits = Recruiting + Retention Leverage

Retirement plans aren’t just a compliance checkbox - they’re a competitive differentiator. Mployer research shows:

  • 23% of employees left a job in the last year for better benefits.
  • 89% are more likely to apply to companies that clearly communicate benefits.
  • Employees significantly undervalue their current benefits, incorrectly believing they are worth about $11,200 annually while the actual investment is closer to $23,200.

That perception gap creates missed opportunities to recruit, engage, and retain the people you want most.

What You Get With Mployer Insights+

Benchmarking your retirement plan is easier than you think.

With Insights+, you’ll receive:

  • A custom 401(k) Competitiveness Score
  • A detailed breakdown of plan strengths and weaknesses
  • Benchmarking across region, industry, and size
  • Participation and contribution comparisons vs. peers
  • A recognition kit for high-performing plans including badges and messaging templates to boost your employer brand

Whether you’re evaluating your broker’s recommendation, planning open enrollment, or preparing for a comp review, this is the data advantage you’ve been missing.

See How Your 401(k) Stacks Up

In a labor market where top talent has options, strong retirement benefits can tip the scale in your favor - but only if you can prove it.

Mployer Insights+ helps you:

  • Quantify your retirement plan’s real value
  • Compare against thousands of actual plans
  • Make improvements with confidence
  • Showcase your investment to candidates and employees alike

Don’t settle for assumptions. Benchmark with precision.

Ready to find out how your plan stacks up? Visit Mployer to get started.

Economy
The Employment Situation for June 2025
The latest economic release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the U.S. job market added 139 thousand jobs last month while unemployment held steady at 4.2%.
June 10, 2025

Editor's Note: This report is based on survey data from May 2025 that was published in June 2025. This is the most recent data available. (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)

The unemployment rate has been remarkably steady for the past year, fluctuating between 4.0% and 4.2% during that term, although there are some significant warning signs that the labor market has softened.

Meanwhile, US employers added 139 thousand jobs, which is on par with the approximate 149 thousand net jobs added over the last 12 months on average, albeit down more than 20% from last month’s initially reported figure of 177 thousand.

While the number of people who have been jobless for 5 weeks or less increased by 264 thousand to reach about 2.5 million, a comparable amount of people (216 thousand) dropped from the ranks of the long-term unemployed - which includes people looking for a job who have been without a job for 27 weeks or more. 

What may be more telling regarding the evolving labor market conditions, however, is the decrease in both employment-population ratio (which dropped 0.3% down to 59.7%) and labor force participation rate (which fell by 0.2% down to 62.4%), both of which indicate that more people are leaving the workforce.

Of the net 139 thousand jobs added last month, the healthcare industry saw the largest uptick, with 62 thousand net new jobs, followed by the leisure and hospitality industry which added 48 thousand net jobs - nearly 2.5x the monthly average of 20 thousand net jobs recorded over the last year.

The social assistance industry also had a net positive increase in payroll figures, adding about 16 thousand jobs all of which were in the individual and family services subset, but most of the rest of the industries saw no meaningful change in employment numbers -  except temporary workers and federal government workers, the latter of which declined by 22 thousand as more of the DOGE workforce cuts began to appear in the data. In total, the federal workforce is down almost 60 thousand jobs in 2025.

The manufacturing sector and retail employees saw relatively minor declines in employment figures, as well. 

Despite the potential softening of the labor market, average hourly wages increased by an average of 15 cents last month, climbing to $36.24 per hour. Average hourly earnings are up almost 4% over the last 12 months.

The average number of hours worked weekly across the US, however, held steady at 34.3 hours for the third month in a row.

Mployer’s Take

The waiting game continues in the labor market, which showed decent gains but also indicated that people are losing confidence in their ability to find a new job in the event that they lose their old one.

Beyond the reductions to the federal workforce, people working temporary jobs saw the next largest decrease, and although that reduction was not particularly significant, fewer temp workers perhaps indicates that employers are being more cautious with their payroll expenditures.

Continued uncertainty surrounding tariffs and federal budgets may be contributing to caution among business leaders, but the 139 thousand net jobs is marginally better than the 130 thousand jobs that economists were forecasting, so perhaps those uncertainties are essentially baked into the workforce calculation equations for the time being at least. 

In effect, the lack of clarity about economic conditions going forward is likely causing employers to be patient when it comes to both hiring new workers and letting existing workers go.

Incidentally, this jobs report will likely lead the Federal Reserve to exercise patience and caution when it comes to lowering the interest rate, as well.

In short, the latest data largely indicates ‘business as usual’ for the immediate future, but with the tariff extension pause for most affected countries scheduled to wrap up in just under a month and with additional uncertainties emerging on the domestic front with regard to immigration enforcement actions and the resulting public response, ‘business as usual’ may be (or may not be) relatively short-lived.

Check out the Mployer blog here.

HR Compliance
Legal/Compliance Roundup - June 2025
Each month, Mployer collects and presents some of the most relevant and most pressing recent changes in law, compliance, and policy in areas related to employee benefits, health care, and human resources.
June 2, 2025

Each month, Mployer collects and presents some of the most relevant and most pressing recent changes in law, compliance, and policy in areas related to employee benefits, health care, and human resources.

EEO-1 Form Data Submission

As of May 20, 2025, the online filing system for Federal EE0-1 Data Submission is now open for submission. Private employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors that meet certain criteria must submit the relevant data by June 24, 2025, which is less time to submit than in previous years. You can read more here

I-9 Form Update

US Citizenship and Immigration Services released a new I-9 form on April 2, 2025. Some of the updates include replacing the word “non-citizen” with “alien” and the word “sex” has replaced “gender.”

The previous I-9 forms - released on August 1, 2023 - remain valid until their listed expiration dates, in 2026 and 2027, respectively.

You can find the new forms here

State Updates

Colorado: Beginning July 1, 2025, Colorado employers that collect biometric data (e.g. fingerprints, retina scans, etc.) from employees and/or job candidates must follow the expanded guidelines laid out in the Colorado Privacy Act, which include implementing a written policy addressing biometric collection protocol and obtaining consent for the collection of biometric data. You can read more here

Also Beginning July 1, 2025, employees taking continuous leave under the Family and Medical Leave Insurance program must be employed for 180 days prior to taking leave in accordance with the program, but employees taking intermittent leave, that job protection begins as soon as an employee hits their 180th day on the job, even if leave has already begun at that point. You can read more here

As of May 16, 2025, Colorado has clarified that protected gender expression in the workplace includes chosen names and pronouns and that continuing to use a person’s birth name and pronouns against their wishes is an act of discrimination. You can read more here.

As of February 1, 2026 Colorado employers that use artificial intelligence to evaluate employees and job applicants are required to take proactive measures to ensure that those platforms are not enabling discriminatory practices. You can read more here.

Georgia: Employers in Georgia must begin phasing out below-minimum wage payments for employees with disabilities, with no new subminimum wage employment agreements beginning July 1, 2025 even for those employers with valid authorization certificates from the Department of Labor. Existing subminimum wage agreements must be equal or greater to half of the federal minimum wage by July 1, 2026 and must equal or exceed federal minimum wage standards by July 1, 2027. You can read more here.

New York: As of May 8, 2025, NY employers with more than 3 employees must conspicuously post their lactation room accommodation policies and guidelines as well as the relevant state requirements both somewhere accessible by all employees and on the organization's intranet if applicable

As of March 22, 2025, all New York employers regardless of size are prohibited from requiring job applicants or employees from providing a copy of their criminal history report that was obtained via the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. 

As of  March 2, 2025, all New York employers are prohibited from requiring job applicants to provide a copy of their criminal history record, which closes a loophole employers had been exploiting to obtain such records despite restrictions regulating their access to those records.

Beginning June 2, 2025, employers with 10 or more retail employees must have in place a written policy and training program for violence prevention measures and retail employers with 500 or more employees must install and/or maintain silent response buttons to alert authorities about emergencies. This legislation was originally slated to take effect March 4, 2025, But was amended to clarify employer responsibilities.

Further, as of January 1, 2025, New York employers are required to provide 20 hours of paid prenatal leave during a 52 week period. Also, as of the new year, the characteristics to which equal protection was extended via the New York State Human Rights Law and the resulting protections are formally enshrined in the New York State Constitution. Those characteristics include: age, disability, ethnicity, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, pregnancy, and anything else related to reproductive healthcare.

Oklahoma: Beginning November 1, 2025, Oklahoma is increasing the allowable tip credit - more info to come as it becomes available. You can read more here.  

Oregon: Beginning July 1, 2025, Minimum wage increases across Oregon - climbing to $16.30 per hour in the Portland metro area, $15.05 per hour in standard counties, and $14.05 per hour in non-urban counties. You can read more about the increase schedule here and determine which counties fall into which categories here

Beginning September 29, 2025, Oregon employers will be prohibited from asking candidates for certain age-related information like date of birth or graduation dates prior to and unless certain conditions are met. You can read more here

Beginning January 1, 2026, Oregon employees will be permitted to utilize sick leave for certain types of blood donations and Oregon employers will be required to provide employees certain information about earnings and deductions on their pay stubs - more information to come as it becomes available. You can read more here and here, respectively.

As of January 1, 2025, Paid Leave Oregon provides leave for employees completing necessary legal steps associated with adopting and/or fostering children.

Tennessee: As of April 11, 2025, employers in Tennessee are required to pay out all owed earnings in the event of an employee’s death. Previously, Tennessee employers could cap those payments at $10,000. You can read more here

Washington: Beginning June 27, 2025, employees in Washington state will be permitted to use sick leave in order to address immigration-related issues. You can read more here.

The Washington state legislature has also updated several laws governing when minors are allowed to work, employee protections, health care worker rest breaks, and workplace safety measures in certain industries. You can find those bills here, here, here, and here, respectively.

Beginning July 27, 2025, Washington employers with at least 50 full-time employees will be required to provide 60 days written notice in advance of layoffs or business closures that result in the loss of employment for at least 50 full-time employees. You can read more here

Also beginning July 27, 2025, Washington employers will no longer be able to require that employees have driver’s licenses unless driving is part of the job function and/or central to a legitimate business purpose, and Washington employers must provide current and former employees (for up to 3 years following their term of employment) with copies of their personnel files at no cost within 21 days of receiving the request. You can read more here and here, respectively. 

The Washington state legislature also made updates to job posting disclosure requirements here that take effect on July 27, 2025, as well.  

Beginning January 1, 2026, the Washington state Paid Family Medical Leave Act will be expanded to include smaller employers. You can read more here

As of May 1, 2025, minimum wage in the city of Bellingham, Washington increased to $18.66 per hour. You can read more here

Wisconsin: The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that state laws that protect job candidates and workers from arrest-record discrimination also apply to non-criminal offenses like civil violations. You can read more here

Minimum Wage For Federal Contractors Rescinded

On March 14, President Trump rescinded Executive Order 14026 - which Biden signed in 2021 and raised the minimum wage for federal contractors from $10.10 per hour to $15 per hour with mechanisms contained within the order to continue increasing this wage minimum over time. 

On January 1, 2025, in accordance with EO 14026, the minimum wage for federal contractors increased to $17.75 per hour, but now that Trump has rescinded EO 14026, it is unclear what the current minimum wage for federal contractors is.

You can read more here.

Alternative Manner For 1095-B & 1095-C Distribution

If your organization is using the alternative method for distributing 1095-B and 1095-C forms in accordance with the Paperwork Burden Reduction Act, your website must be in compliance from the first business day of March through at least October 15th. You can find guidance from the IRS about how to properly follow compliance protocols here.

DEI Executive Orders Paused

On February 21, 2025, a federal judge put a stay on Trump’s Executive Order limiting the ability of federal agencies and federal contractors to operate Diversity Equity and Inclusion programs. The court questioned whether the order violated free speech rights and potentially illegally restricted otherwise legal actions taken by private entities. You can find the decision here

Form 300A Submission Due

From February 1st to April 30th, non-exempt (low hazard) employers who had at least 11 employees at some point in 2024 must post in a conspicuous place a copy of OSHA Form 300A, Summary of Work-Related Illness and Injury, certified by a company executive.

For non-exempt employers that had 250 or more employees at some point last year and employers with 20 or more employees in specified high risk industries, OSHA requires electronic submissions, which are due by March 2nd, 2025. 

You can find the electronic submission platform here

EAD Extension Formalized

As of January 13, 2025, the extension period for certain renewal Employee Authorization Document (EAD) applications filed on May 4, 2022 or later has been formalized at 540 days.

You can read more here.

 

IRS Mileage Reimbursement Rate Increased

As of January 1, 2025, the IRS mileage reimbursement rate for road miles driven for business purposes increased by 3 cents per mile from 67 to 70 cents per mile driven. 

DOL Reinstates Simplified Tip Credit Rule

In response to a Federal Court of Appeals Decision that vacated the so-called 80/20/30 rule that was instituted in 2021, the Department of Labor officially reverted to the previous tip credit rule.

You can read more here.

Increased ACA Flexibility and Affordability Threshold

As of January 1, 2025, the threshold for what qualifies as affordable coverage is now 9.02%, which means that an employee’s required contribution to the plan can be no more than 9.02% of their salary in order for the plan to be considered affordable and to avoid potentially paying the penalty. 

You can read more about the affordability threshold here.

IRS Publishes 2025 Annual Retirement Plan Maximums

  • The 401(k) annual contribution limit increased from $23,000 to $23,500 in 2025.
  • The catch-up contribution limit stayed unchanged at $7,500 for participants aged 50 and over.
  • The SECURE Act 2.0 also instituted a new type of catch-up contribution, which enables participating people (age 60 to 63) to contribute up to $11,250 annually.

You can read more here

IRS Publishes 2025 Annual Benefit Maximums

  • The HFSA contribution max is $3,300 (maximum carryover is $650 for HFSAs with carryover features).
  • The QSEHRA max for total reimbursements is $6,350 for single coverage and $12,800 for family coverage.
  • The max employee tax credit for adoption assistance is $17,280, with additional conditions depending on employee salary range. 
  • The monthly parking and mass transit benefit max is $325. 

You can find the complete IRS 2025 benefit contribution limit list here.

ERISA Guidance for Long-Term Part-Time Employees

You can find guidance for ERISA 403(b) plan eligibility requirements for long-term, part-time employees according to the updated standards from the Secure ACT 2.0 here.

Employee Benefits
How Benefits Correlate to Attraction and Retention
Hiring and retaining talent continues to be one of the biggest challenges facing employers today. With rising salary expectations and increasing turnover rates, organizations are under pressure to find sustainable, high-impact ways to attract and keep top talent.
June 1, 2025

How Benefits Correlate to Attraction and Retention

Why offering and communicating great benefits drives core HR performance

Hiring and retaining talent continues to be one of the biggest challenges facing employers today. With rising salary expectations and increasing turnover rates, organizations are under pressure to find sustainable, high-impact ways to attract and keep top talent.

One of the clearest and most controllable drivers of success? Employee benefits. And just as importantly, how those benefits are perceived by employees.

Our recent data from over 700 companies and 10,000 employees in 2024 and early 2025 confirms this: benefits are the second-most important factor influencing employee satisfaction, just behind compensation.

In fact, 76% of employees cite benefits including medical, leave, retirement, and financial programs as a top reason they choose to join or stay with a company. That’s ahead of their boss, company culture, leadership, and even mission.

In short: benefits are not secondary, they’re strategic.

Why Benefit Expectations Are Higher Than Ever

Over the past few years, benefit expectations have shifted dramatically. The pandemic changed how employees think about health, family time, flexibility, and mental well-being. Rising out-of-pocket medical costs, the growth of remote and hybrid work, and a greater awareness of employer-provided financial security have made benefits one of the most discussed aspects of compensation - not just in exit interviews, but in Glassdoor reviews, LinkedIn posts, and team chats.

Simply offering a health plan isn’t enough anymore. Today’s workforce expects benefits that are modern, inclusive, and meaningful. Employees also expect employers to communicate clearly about what’s being offered.

That’s why we analyzed how employee-perceived benefit quality correlates with performance on key HR metrics. The companies that perform best? They don’t just offer strong benefits, they ensure employees know and value them.

Great Benefits Drive Key People Metrics

32% Faster Time to Fill

Companies with highly rated benefits fill roles 32% faster on average. That’s not a small number when each open role represents lost productivity, added stress on teams, and missed business opportunities.

One mid-sized tech company we worked with had a senior data role open for 90 days. At an estimated $1,000/day in opportunity cost and internal time, that single opening cost them over $90,000, and that figure doesn’t take delayed product launches into account. After updating how they presented their benefits and gathering employee feedback to showcase online, they cut their average time-to-fill to under 60 days for similar roles. That’s a $30K+ impact per hire.

When job seekers understand the value of your benefits, they’re more likely to apply and say yes to offers, which can reduce your hiring cycle by days or even weeks.

21% Lower Voluntary Turnover

Turnover is expensive, especially when it’s your best people walking out the door. Companies with top-rated benefits by employees saw 21% lower annual voluntary turnover. That’s a powerful retention lever. When employees feel supported through comprehensive health plans, generous parental leave, mental health resources, and financial wellness programs, they’re less likely to leave, even when other offers come their way.

A 21% reduction in voluntary turnover on a 100-person team could mean keeping 10–15 more experienced employees each year. That’s not just savings, that’s momentum.

9x More Likely to Be Selected by Job Seekers

In competitive markets, benefits are a differentiator - but only when they’re visible. Candidates are 9x more likely to choose companies that clearly showcase strong benefits. Whether on Glassdoor, your careers page, or through employee word-of-mouth, clear communication around benefits drives candidate behavior.

Think of it this way: two companies offer similar pay. One has three bullet points on benefits. The other shows employee ratings, gives specific plan details, and includes testimonials. The choice becomes obvious.

People don’t just want good benefits, they want to feel confident in what they’re getting, before they make a move.

75% of Employees Who Rate Benefits as “Excellent” Also Rate Loyalty as “High”

There’s a strong link between benefits and employee loyalty. Among employees who rated their benefits as “excellent,” 75% also rated their loyalty to the company as “high.” That’s not a coincidence, it’s a signal. Benefits contribute directly to how connected, appreciated, and committed employees feel.

Loyalty is about more than tenure, it’s about energy, advocacy, and long-term value. Benefits help build that loyalty day by day.

What Counts as “Highly Rated” Benefits?

In our analysis, the companies with the strongest HR outcomes weren’t necessarily the ones with the most expensive benefits, but the ones with well-designed, well-communicated offerings that employees consistently rated highly.

Highly rated benefits often include:

  • Competitive medical plans with transparent costs
  • Paid family and medical leave
  • Mental health and wellness support
  • Retirement matching or financial coaching
  • Inclusive plans that support diverse needs (e.g., fertility, gender-affirming care, caregiving)

What they all share is clarity and consistency, both in what’s offered and in how it’s experienced.

Benefits Aren’t Just a Line Item - They’re a Leverage Point

The data is clear: companies that offer and communicate great benefits perform better across key HR and people metrics.

Faster hiring. Lower turnover. Stronger engagement.

And the connective thread through it all? Employees knowing their benefits matter and feeling the value in their day-to-day experience.

Benefits shouldn’t be treated as background noise. They’re central to the employee experience and one of the few investments that directly influence both recruiting and retention outcomes.

Want to understand how your benefits are perceived? Or see how you compare to other employers in your market?

We’d be happy to show you, just reach out to start the conversation.

Get your free Insights+ report today at mployeradvisor.com.

Compliance & Policy
The One Big Beautiful Bill: 6 Ways It Impacts Employer-Sponsored Healthcare
We break down six major provisions from the new bill that will directly affect employer-sponsored healthcare plans—with added detail on what each means for HR leaders, brokers, and benefit consultants.
May 27, 2025

The One Big Beautiful Bill: 6 Ways It Impacts Employer-Sponsored Healthcare

On May 22, the House narrowly passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, a sweeping legislative package that slashes over $1 trillion in healthcare spending - most notably through cuts to Medicaid, changes to Medicare, and tighter control over the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions.

But buried in the bill’s 11th-hour amendments and complex fiscal shifts are several consequential reforms that could reshape the way employers provide healthcare benefits. It still needs to pass the Senate.

Below, we break down six major provisions from the bill that will directly affect employer-sponsored healthcare plans, with added detail on what each means for HR leaders, brokers, and benefit consultants.

1. ICHRAs Get a Boost: Favorable Signals and Financial Incentives

What changed?

The bill expands Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements (ICHRAs) by allowing employees to use pre-tax dollars to purchase ACA marketplace (exchange) plans. For the first time, small employers who offer ICHRAs are eligible for a new tax credit (details pending Treasury guidance, but estimates suggest it could offset up to 50% of administrative and contribution costs for employers with fewer than 50 employees).

Why it matters:

ICHRAs allow employers to reimburse employees for individual health insurance rather than providing a group health plan. The concept was initially met with lukewarm reception but has gained traction in recent years, though still minimal adoption (less than 2%).

This bill signals an endorsement from the current administration, making ICHRAs a potentially central pillar of the future employer health plan landscape. With the exchange rules also being tightened (see #3), this move creates a more stable and predictable ecosystem for employers looking to shift toward defined contribution models.

Expected impact:

Estimates from policy analysts suggest that this provision could increase ICHRA adoption by 20–30% over the next three years, bringing potentially 2–4 million more workers into ICHRA arrangements by 2027. This is still just 5% of employees on employer-sponsored care, but a few more tweaks could continue to increase that number.

2. Health Savings Account (HSA) Expansion: More Flexibility, Broader Appeal

What changed?

The bill significantly loosens the rules around HSAs:

  • Annual contribution limits increased (projected cap: ~$10,000 for individuals and $20,000 for families).
  • Bronze and Catastrophic plans in the individual market are now deemed HSA-compatible.
  • HSA funds can now be used for gym memberships, certain fitness apps, and sports-related activities (pending IRS definitions).

Why it matters:

These updates make HSAs far more versatile and attractive. For employers, pairing HSA-qualified high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) with expanded HSA usage can serve as a cost-control strategy while still supporting employee wellness.

The compatibility of Bronze and Catastrophic plans with HSAs also complements the ICHRA expansion, since many exchange plans fall into these tiers. It paves the way for consumer-driven health models that blend pre-tax benefits with individual choice.

3. Stricter Exchange Rules and Employer Mandate Enforcement

What changed?

The bill implements a host of ACA exchange-related reforms, including:

  • Stricter eligibility verification for subsidies and zero-premium plans.
  • Shortened open enrollment by one month.
  • Eliminated automatic re-enrollment into Silver plans.
  • Insurers can deny coverage to applicants behind on premium payments.

Why it matters:

These changes aim to clamp down on fraud and subsidy misuse - issues that have dogged the exchange system since inception. Reports indicated that some individuals overstated income or took advantage of lenient re-enrollment policies.

From an employer perspective, particularly those using ICHRA models, this introduces both compliance pressures and risk mitigation benefits. While tighter enrollment rules may create more friction for employees navigating exchanges, they also stabilize the risk pool, potentially lowering premium volatility.

4. Restoring Cost-Sharing Reductions: A Lifeline to Exchange Stability

What changed?

The bill restores cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments to insurers that serve the lowest-income ACA enrollees. These payments that were defunded in 2017. At the same time, it bars CSR funds for plans that include abortion coverage.

Why it matters:

CSR payments lower out-of-pocket costs for enrollees and stabilize insurance pricing. Their return is a boon to insurers, allowing them to offer lower deductibles and premiums on Silver-tier plans, particularly important for ICHRA participants who may rely on this tier to maximize value.

It’s also a subtle but significant endorsement of the ACA exchange infrastructure, reinforcing its viability for employer-funded individual insurance. In effect, this provision serves as another indirect boost to ICHRA success.

5. Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Reform: Transparency That Could Spill Over

What changed?

While most of the PBM reforms target Medicare Part D and Advantage, the bill:

  • Requires PBMs to "delink" compensation from negotiated discounts.
  • Bans spread pricing (when PBMs charge insurers more than they pay pharmacies).
  • Increases data transparency requirements.

Why it matters:

These changes don’t directly apply to employer-sponsored commercial plans...yet. But PBM practices are under bipartisan scrutiny, and Medicare regulations often act as a precedent for broader industry reform.

Employers who self-fund plans or partner with third-party administrators (TPAs) could soon benefit from greater insight into drug pricing, rebates, and margins. At minimum, this raises employee awareness and expectation for cost transparency.

6. Lawful Immigrant Coverage Restrictions: HR and DEI Challenges Ahead

What changed?

The bill restricts lawful immigrant access to unsubsidized exchange coverage and makes DACA recipients ineligible for premium subsidies.

Why it matters:

For employers with diverse workforces - including those using ICHRA to cover part-time, seasonal, or contract labor - this provision introduces coverage challenges. Employees affected by these rules may face higher premiums or complete ineligibility for coverage options, potentially increasing uninsured rates.

This raises ethical and equity questions, particularly for organizations committed to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) principles. HR leaders may need to rethink how they support affected workers, or whether to offer alternative employer-funded benefits.

Final Thoughts

While the One Big Beautiful Bill is still awaiting Senate action and final reconciliation, its passage through the House offers a roadmap for where healthcare policy is heading, toward leaner federal spending, tighter exchange oversight, and growing support for consumer-driven models like ICHRAs and HSAs.

For employers, this means:

  • Proactive benefits strategy is key.
  • ICHRAs are getting stickier and may soon become mainstream.
  • Transparency and accountability will be expected across PBM, exchange, and employee communications.

Now is the time for HR teams and brokers to evaluate how these shifts can be leveraged strategically—not just to stay compliant, but to build more flexible and cost-effective benefits for a changing workforce.

Labor Market Insights
The Market Employment Summary for May 2025
Meta Description: Each month, Mployer breaks down the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ most recent State Employment and Unemployment Summary to highlight some employment trends across various markets. This is an overview of May’s report.
May 23, 2025

Editor's Note: This report is based on survey data from April 2025 that was published in May 2025. This is the most recent data available. (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)

US employers exceeded job forecasts by almost one-third, adding 177 thousand new entries to their payrolls last month, which was almost 40 thousand more than had been predicted.

Only 5 states saw a net increase in jobs, however, while the remaining states and Washington DC recorded no meaningful movement in net job figures. 

Meanwhile, the national unemployment rate remained essentially unchanged through April at 4.2%.

Over the course of the month, however, 3 states plus Washington DC recorded an increase in statewide unemployment, while 2 states registered a decrease in unemployment rate and the remaining states saw no significant change.

16 states have seen an increase in net jobs throughout the last 12 months, while the remaining 34 plus Washington DC have recorded no net movement over the year. 

Below is the breakdown of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) market employment summary from the May 2025 report.

States With the Highest Unemployment Rates

Washington DC was the ‘state’ with the highest unemployment rate last month at 5.8% overtaking Nevada which had been on a 5-month streak with the highest unemployment rate. 

The unemployment rate in Washington DC climbed from 5.6% to 5.8% over the month, while Nevada’s unemployment rate continued its downward trajectory, decreasing from 5.7% to 5.6%.

Only 5 other states recorded an unemployment rate that was significantly above the national average in April - Michigan (5.5%), California (5.3%), Kentucky (5.2%), Ohio (4.9%), and Illinois (4.8%).

Besides Washington DC, there were only 3 states that recorded an increase in unemployment rate - Massachusetts (+0.2% unemployment, climbing from 4.4% to 4.6%), Iowa (+ 0.1%, rising from 3.4% to 3.5%), and Virginia (+0.1%, increasing from 3.2% to 3.3%). 

Over the last 12 months, 27 states have recorded an increase in unemployment rate, led by Mississippi at plus 1.2% and Michigan at plus 1.1%.

States With The Lowest Unemployment Rates

South Dakota notched its 16th consecutive month as the state with the lowest unemployment rate, holding steady at 1.8% through April. 

In total, 19 states recorded unemployment rates significantly below the national average of 4.2%. While South Dakota was the only state to show unemployment below 2%, there were 4 states with unemployment rates below 3% last month - Hawaii (2.9%), Montana (2.7%), Vermont (2.7%), and North Dakota (2.6%).

Over the last month, only 2 states recorded a drop in unemployment rate - Indiana (-0.2%, decreasing from 4.1% unemployment to 3.9% over the year), and Nevada (-0.1%, falling from 5.7% to 5.6%). 

Over the last 12 months, only Montana posted a net decrease in unemployment rate at - 0.3%.

States With New Job Losses

No state recorded significant net job losses over the last month or over the last year.

States With New Job Gains

5 states saw a significant increase in net jobs over the course of April. Texas had the largest increase in raw state payroll count at almost 38 thousand, followed by Ohio at about 22 thousand, and North Carolina at about 18 thousand.

In terms of proportional job growth, Arizona, Connecticut, North Carolina, and Ohio all recorded a 0.4% increase, while Texas posted 0.3% growth.

From April 2024 through April 2025, 16 states recorded a net increase in job growth, with the largest raw figure increases occurring in Texas (plus about 216 thousand jobs), Florida (plus about 144 thousand jobs), and New York (plus about 114 thousand jobs).

The largest percentage increase in the state workforce over the last 12 months, however, was claimed by Hawaii (plus 2.7%), followed by South Carolina (plus 2.4%), and Idaho (2.3%).

Mployer’s Take

This report represents the final data from Trump’s first 100 days in office during his second term, which is historically when presidents accomplish a disproportionate amount of their agendas. 

That said, many of the workforce cuts in the federal government that have taken place since Trump repurposed the Department of Government Efficiency led by Elon Musk to the task have yet to impact the unemployment and jobs data due to how and when those job reductions are captured and measured.

Similarly, while the threat and implementation of tariffs may yet have a more significant impact on national employment, the vast majority of tariffs that Trump implemented are currently on pause for another 6 weeks, and while the uncertainty is likely affecting the labor market to some degree, the impacts thus far have been relatively minimal. 

The continued strength of the labor market has significantly reduced the likelihood that the Fed will bring down interest rates when they meet again to discuss the matter next month. In fact, rate reductions at any point over the summer are looking less realistic at this point, although conditions can change very quickly, especially in the event that the tariff pause is not extended when it expires in early July.

Perhaps the most significant indicators of economic problems that may lay ahead are the interest rates attached to US Treasury bonds, which have been increasing as current investors (both foreign and domestic) unload their bond holdings to a buyer pool that is demanding increasingly higher returns.

Those bond interest rate increases reflect decreased confidence in both short and long term US economic health and increased concern in the ability of the US government to service its growing debt. 

Further, these issues may become exacerbated should the Senate get on board with the House’s Big Beautiful Bill given the trillions of additional debt the plan will result in if ultimately enacted into law and if the US GDP growth is unable to offset the spending increases and tax cuts included in the bill. 

The US recorded negative GDP growth in the first quarter of 2025 and if that trajectory holds or continues downward, the US economic conditions will be formally labeled as a recession as early as July as well, and while negative GDP growth in the current quarter is not a foregone conclusion, crossing that threshold would likely result in other negative economic feedback effects to pile on the situation.

In short, July may be a very meaningful month when it comes to both determining and assessing the US economic trajectory going forward.

Looking for more exclusive content? Check out the Mployer blog.