By Mployer Team
Sep 25, 2025
Updated
November 24, 2025
6
min read

Navigating the New H1-B Reality: A Guide for HR Professionals

The H1-B visa program, designed to bring skilled foreign workers to the U.S. for "specialty occupations," is undergoing significant changes that demand your attention. The H1-B visa process is a multi-step, multi-cost journey. Before the recent changes, the primary costs were for filing fees, which typically ranged from $2,000 to $5,000, depending on the size of the employer and the specific application type [1]. The process begins with an employer submitting an electronic registration for a foreign worker during a specific period each March. If selected in the annual lottery, the employer then files the full H1-B petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The annual cap is 85,000 visas, but demand consistently outstrips supply, with hundreds of thousands of applicants vying for a spot each year (USCIS, 2025). Historically, the program has seen a sharp increase in registrations, but a new beneficiary-centric lottery system implemented in recent years has helped curb duplicate applications, leading to a notable drop in eligible registrations for the most recent fiscal years.

The information technology (IT) industry is by far the biggest user of the H1-B visa, accounting for over 65% of visa holders (Image 2) [2]. This trend has been consistent, with major tech companies and IT consulting firms like Amazon, Tata Consultancy Services, Microsoft, Meta, and Google topping the list of H1-B sponsors. These companies primarily use the visa to fill roles for software engineers, data analysts, AI researchers, and other tech specialists. However, other industries like finance, healthcare, and higher education also rely heavily on the visa to fill specialized positions.

Key Legislative Changes and What They Mean for HR

The landscape of H1-B hiring has been dramatically reshaped by two major legislative actions. In a significant move, a new proclamation was issued on September 19, 2025, which, as of September 21, 2025, requires a one-time $100,000 payment for most new H1-B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries who are outside the United States [3]. This substantial fee, a dramatic increase from previous costs, is aimed at discouraging the hiring of lower-skilled, lower-paid foreign workers and instead, incentivizing companies to hire the "best and brightest." For HR, this signals a major shift from a volume-based lottery strategy to a more meritocratic, high-cost model. The proclamation is currently slated to last for 12 months, but it may be extended or subject to further clarification from government agencies [4].

For current H1-B visa holders, and those with petitions filed before September 21, 2025, this new fee does not apply [5]. Existing visa holders can continue to travel and re-enter the country as they normally would, and visa renewals are not subject to the new fee. However, some legal experts advise against unnecessary international travel for those whose petitions were filed after the effective date, due to the lack of clear guidance on how the new fee would be applied upon re-entry.

Separate, but related, proposed legislation is currently moving through the rulemaking process. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing a rule to replace the current random H1-B lottery system with a weighted selection process that would favor higher-skilled and higher-paid applicants. This proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2025, opening a 30-day public comment period that ends on October 24, 2025 [6]. After the comment period, DHS will review the feedback and may issue a final rule. If finalized in time, this new system could be in effect for the next H1-B cap season beginning in March 2026.

The new $100,000 fee and proposed changes are not without opposition. Many legal experts and industry leaders argue that the proclamation exceeds the President's authority by instituting a fee that is not tied to administrative costs, as fees typically are. Legal challenges are almost certain, and courts could potentially strike down the fee [7]. Furthermore, there is public and political pressure to repeal the measure, as critics argue it will drive talent and jobs overseas, harm U.S. competitiveness, and effectively dismantle the H1-B program for all but the largest corporations. While it is unclear if these efforts will succeed, HR professionals should stay informed on the evolving legal landscape, as a successful legal challenge could reverse these recent changes.

Moving From Lottery to Elite Talent Strategy: Key Considerations

The H1-B program is no longer a volume game of chance but a calculated, high-stakes investment; a fundamental shift in the American talent strategy. For HR professionals, this means moving beyond reactive compliance and embracing a proactive, strategic role. You must become a key partner in workforce planning, advising leadership on how to balance global talent needs with the new financial realities. The path forward requires a focus on quality over quantity, meticulous legal vigilance, and a clear, well-communicated strategy for both current and future employees.

Here are some key considerations as you begin to prepare the way forward for your own workforce:

1. Strategic Workforce Planning. The new $100,000 fee for new H1-B petitions filed for beneficiaries abroad makes sponsoring international talent a high-stakes, high-cost decision. Begin reevaluating your talent pipeline, prioritizing critical roles that require highly specialized skills, and considering if the investment is justified for each position. You'll need to work closely with department heads to identify essential roles that cannot be filled by the domestic workforce.

2. Budgetary and Financial Adjustments. The new fee is a dramatic increase from prior costs, which were typically under $5,000. For companies that rely on a large number of H1-B hires, this could add millions of dollars to the annual budget. HR and finance departments need to collaborate to re-budget for future international hires and plan for the potential financial impact.

3. Shifting to a Meritocratic System. The proposed weighted lottery system will favor higher-skilled, higher-paid applicants. This change moves the H1-B program away from a random chance and toward a system that rewards higher salaries. HR should be prepared for this by ensuring compensation for sponsored roles is competitive and aligns with the highest wage tiers to increase the chances of selection.

4. Navigating Uncertainty and Legal Challenges. The new fee and proposed changes are facing significant legal challenges. The situation is fluid, and further guidance from government agencies is expected. HR professionals need to stay informed by consulting with immigration counsel and legal experts regularly. It is also critical to advise current H1-B employees on the potential risks of international travel, as the new rules are still being clarified and could impact their re-entry.

The challenge is significant, but for those who adapt, the H1-B program will remain a powerful tool for securing the elite, specialized talent that drives innovation and growth.

In-Text Citations

[1] NNU Immigration. (2025). H1B Visa Cost & Fees 2025. Retrieved from https://www.nnuimmigration.com/h1b-visa-cost/

[2] American Immigration Council. (2025). Trump's $100,000 Fee for H-1B Visas: What You Need to Know. Retrieved from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/trump-100000-fee-h1b-visa/

[3] The White House. (2025). Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Suspends the Entry of Certain Alien Nonimmigrant Workers. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restriction-on-entry-of-certain-nonimmigrant-workers/

[4] Holland & Knight. (2025). Summary of Presidential Proclamation: Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers. Retrieved from https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/09/summary-of-presidential-proclamation-restriction-on-entry-of-certain [5] USCIS. (2025). H-1B FAQ. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/h-1b-faq

[6] Fragomen. (2025). United States: DHS Proposes Wage Level-Based Weighted System of H-1B Cap Allocation. Retrieved from https://www.fragomen.com/insights/united-states-dhs-proposes-wage-level-based-weighted-system-of-h-1b-cap-allocation.html

[7] The Guardian. (2025). Trump signs proclamation imposing annual $100,000 fee on H-1B visas. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/09/19/trump-h1b-visa-100000-fee

Next Up

2026 Benefits State of the Union: Leave Benefits Part 1 of 2: Vacation, Holidays, Sick Leave & Workplace Flexibility

July 17, 2026

Leave Is the Benefit Employees Feel Every Week

Mployer rates employer benefit plans across four pillars: Medical, Ancillary, Leave, and Retirement. Of the four, leave carries the lowest direct cash cost to the employer outside of the opportunity cost of time away from work. And yet leave is consistently among the highest-valued benefits employees cite, particularly among workers entering the workforce in the past two decades. For younger employees who grew up with greater flexibility as an expectation rather than a perk, PTO policies, remote work options, and holiday calendars are not peripheral considerations. They are factors that influence job acceptance decisions, day-to-day job satisfaction, and the calculus of whether to stay or leave.

This is Part 1 of a two-part series on leave benefits. This post covers the foundational elements: vacation, paid holidays, sick leave, consolidated vs. non-consolidated leave structures, workplace flexibility, and the legal framework that governs when leave is required vs. when it is discretionary. Part 2 will go deep on maternity and parental leave, including benefit duration, disability payment interaction, top-off provisions, and how this rapidly evolving category varies by industry and employer size.

The Legal Framework: What Is Required and What Is a Choice

Before reviewing the benchmarks, it is important to understand the distinction between leave that employers are legally required to provide and leave that is entirely discretionary. Many employers conflate these, either overclaiming legal mandates that do not apply to them or unknowingly underdelivering on ones that do.

FMLA: The Federal Floor

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) is the primary federal law governing employee leave. It requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year for qualifying reasons, including the birth or adoption of a child, a serious health condition of the employee or a close family member, or qualifying military exigencies. A critical word in that sentence is unpaid. FMLA guarantees job protection and continuation of health insurance during leave. It does not require the employer to pay the employee during that time.

FMLA applies to employers with 50 or more employees within 75 miles. Eligible employees must have worked for the employer for at least 12 months and logged at least 1,250 hours in the prior year. Employers below 50 employees are not covered by federal FMLA, which is a meaningful distinction for the substantial share of small employers in the national workforce.

State Leave Laws: A Patchwork Expanding Rapidly

State leave laws have multiplied significantly over the past decade and frequently go beyond FMLA in scope, coverage thresholds, or paid leave requirements. Several categories are worth understanding:

  • State FMLA equivalents. Many states have their own family and medical leave laws that cover smaller employers than federal FMLA. California, New Jersey, New York, Washington, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Oregon, Colorado, and others have state-level laws with their own thresholds, durations, and coverage rules. An employer with 15 employees in California faces leave obligations that a similarly sized employer in a state without equivalent law does not.
  • Paid family and medical leave programs. A growing number of states have established state-run paid leave insurance programs, funded through payroll contributions from employees, employers, or both. These programs pay a wage replacement benefit to employees on qualifying leave. Employers in these states do not necessarily pay the leave benefit directly, but they are responsible for administering the program, managing payroll deductions, and coordinating the state benefit with any employer-provided leave.
  • Paid sick leave mandates. More than a dozen states and many municipalities now require employers to provide a minimum number of paid sick leave days, regardless of size. The minimums vary by jurisdiction, typically ranging from 3 to 5 days per year for smaller employers to more generous amounts for larger ones. Employers operating in multiple states must manage a patchwork of minimum requirements.

The practical implication for any multi-state employer: your leave compliance obligation is not a single federal standard. It is the most protective standard that applies in each jurisdiction where you have employees. Staying current requires active monitoring as state laws continue to evolve.

Paid Holidays: No Federal Requirement for Private Employers

Here is a fact that surprises many employees and even some HR professionals: private sector employers in the United States have no federal legal obligation to provide any paid holidays. The list of federal holidays, which includes New Year’s Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas, and others, applies to federal government employees. Private employers are entirely free to choose which holidays to observe, how many to provide, and whether they are paid.

In practice, the market has established strong norms around holiday calendars. Employers who observe fewer than the common major federal holidays face a competitive disadvantage in recruiting. But the specific holidays offered, the total number, and whether floating holidays or personal days supplement the calendar are all employer-determined choices with real variation in the market.

Six paid holidays is the single most common offering nationally, provided by one in five employers. But the distribution spans from five or fewer to thirteen or more, and the seven-day average is pulled upward by generous employers at the top of the range. The practical range of six to nine days covers 65% of employers. An employer offering five or fewer paid holidays is below market in a way that is visible to candidates who are comparing offers. An employer offering ten or more is offering a genuinely above-market benefit that is worth communicating explicitly in recruiting.

It is also worth noting the difference between public and private sector norms. Federal and state government employers typically observe all federal and state holidays, often reaching 11 or more paid days annually. Private employers who compete for talent against government roles, especially in certain regions or professional categories, face a visible gap if their holiday calendar is at the lower end of the private sector range.

Key Terms Every Benefits Decision Maker Should Know

  • Consolidated (or PTO) leave. A consolidated leave plan pools vacation, sick, and personal days into a single paid-time-off bank that employees draw from as needed. Employees decide how to use the time without categorizing it. Employers gain administrative simplicity and eliminate the awkward dynamic of employees being required to call in sick when they are taking a mental health day or handling personal matters. 46% of employers nationally offer consolidated leave, according to Mployer’s 2026 data.
  • Non-consolidated leave. A non-consolidated structure tracks vacation, sick, and personal days as separate buckets with their own balances, accrual rates, and rules. Employees must use the appropriate category for each absence. While more administratively complex, non-consolidated plans can provide more total time off since employees tend not to use all of their sick days in low-illness years.
  • Carryover. Carryover provisions allow employees to roll unused leave from one year into the next. 65% of employers offer a carryover provision for sick days. 19% allow unlimited carryover. The alternative, use-it-or-lose-it policies, encourages employees to take time off but creates end-of-year pressure and can result in operational disruption.
  • Unlimited PTO. An arrangement where no fixed cap is placed on paid time off. The employee takes what they need with manager approval. Only 9% of employers offer this nationally, despite its outsized visibility in recruiting. Research consistently shows that employees with unlimited PTO often take less time off than those with defined banks, because the absence of a defined balance creates ambiguity about what is truly acceptable.
  • Accrual. Leave accrues over time, typically expressed as hours per pay period or days per month. New employees often have limited leave in their first year. Employers who front-load leave at the start of each year, rather than requiring it to accrue, offer a more employee-friendly structure.
  • Top-off. In the context of disability-related leave, an employer may top off a short-term disability benefit by paying the difference between the disability wage replacement (typically 60% of salary) and the employee’s full salary. This is most relevant in parental leave design and will be covered in depth in Part 2.

The chart above shows a consistent pattern across all tenure milestones: employees at employers with consolidated leave plans receive meaningfully more vacation days than those on non-consolidated plans. At one year of tenure, the gap is 4.3 days (13.5 consolidated vs. 9.2 non-consolidated). At 20 years, the gap is 4.2 days (22.3 vs. 18.1). This reflects the structural reality that consolidated plans typically set a total PTO balance that includes what would otherwise be split across vacation, sick, and personal categories. The total bank is larger because it is serving multiple purposes.

The tenure progression also matters for employers thinking about leave as a retention tool. An employee at year 5 in a consolidated plan has 17.6 days. Their counterpart at a non-consolidated employer has 13.2. That 4.4-day difference compounds over a career and becomes a meaningful factor in whether a tenured employee considers leaving. Employers who have not benchmarked their vacation accrual schedule by tenure against peers in their industry and size band may not realize how their program compares at the years of service where retention pressure is highest.

Workplace Flexibility: The Post-Pandemic Recalibration

Workplace flexibility surged during the pandemic and became one of the most cited employee preferences in every post-2020 benefits survey. The 2026 data shows the market pulling back from its pandemic peak. Fully remote arrangements are now offered by 23% of employers, work-from-home options by 22%, and unlimited PTO by just 9%. These numbers are lower than what many employees experienced at the height of 2020 to 2022, and that gap between expectation and current market reality is one the most active sources of employee dissatisfaction in leave-related discussions.

For employers, the flexibility picture requires honest self-assessment. If your organization has pulled back from flexibility arrangements that were extended during the pandemic, the competitive context has shifted: the employers who maintained those arrangements are now differentiating on a dimension that is highly visible to candidates. If your business model genuinely requires in-person work, the relevant benchmark is not the fully remote employer but the other employers in your industry and region competing for the same workforce. That is exactly the kind of cohort comparison a custom benchmarking analysis provides.

Sick Leave and Carryover: The Details That Matter

Sick leave policy is one of the most administratively variable elements of a leave program. 65% of employers offer a carryover provision that allows unused sick days to roll into the following year. 19% allow unlimited carryover, placing no cap on the sick day balance an employee can accumulate over time. Use-it-or-lose-it sick policies, while simpler to administer, can create employee hardship in years with significant illness and may conflict with state-level sick leave mandates in jurisdictions that explicitly require carryover.

The interaction between sick leave and short-term disability coverage is also worth understanding. For many employers, sick leave effectively serves as the waiting period, or elimination period, before short-term disability benefits begin. An employee with 10 accrued sick days who experiences a two-week illness may use those sick days before STD coverage activates. Employees without sufficient sick leave balances, or in plans where sick leave and STD do not coordinate, face an income gap. How these two programs interact is a design decision that affects real employee financial security and is worth reviewing explicitly.

A Note on Maternity and Parental Leave

Nationally, 68% of employers offer dedicated maternity leave beyond what statutory short-term disability provides. 32% do not. That statistic is at the national level and covers all employer sizes and industries. The variation beneath that headline number is significant: duration of paid leave, how disability income is structured, whether employers top off the disability benefit to approach full salary replacement, bonding leave for non-birth parents, and adoption leave policies all vary widely. These dimensions are among the most actively discussed benefits in today’s candidate conversations and are closely tracked by employees considering family formation.

Part 2 of this series will go deep on maternity and parental leave. We will cover average paid leave duration by industry, how short-term disability interacts with maternity leave, what topping off disability means and how common it is, paternity and non-birth-parent bonding leave benchmarks, and adoption leave trends. If your organization is actively recruiting in competitive talent markets or is thinking through a parental leave update ahead of open enrollment, that post is worth reading closely.

Leave as a Competitive Differentiator: How to Use It, How to Talk About It

Leave benefits are one of the most emotionally resonant elements of an employee’s relationship with their employer. They represent how an organization actually treats its people when life happens: when someone is sick, when a child is born, when a family member needs care, or when an employee simply needs time to recharge. Employees who feel their leave program is generous are more likely to stay. Employees who feel it is stingy are more likely to leave, and more likely to say so in exit interviews and public reviews.

The challenge for most employers is that they do not know how their leave program actually compares. They know their own policy, but they do not know whether their vacation accrual schedule, their holiday count, their sick leave carryover rules, and their flexibility arrangements are above market, at market, or below market against the specific employers competing for the same candidates. Without that context, it is impossible to talk credibly about leave as a differentiator or to address an employee’s complaint about time off with anything more than a defensive response.

The next time an employee raises a concern about paid time off, or a candidate asks how your leave program compares, you should be able to answer with data. Not a general impression that your program is competitive, but a specific, benchmarked answer: our employees at five years of tenure receive 17.6 days of paid time off, which is above the national average for employers in our industry and size band. That answer requires knowing where you stand, and knowing where you stand requires a benchmark built from employers who actually look like you, not a national average that flattens the variation that matters.

Strong leave programs are also an underused marketing asset. Employers who score at Market Leading or above in the Mployer Leave pillar have a specific, documented, independently verified statement to make in offer letters, careers pages, and job postings: our leave program has been rated above market against employers in our industry, region, and size. That is a recruiting signal most employers are not making, because most employers have never taken the step of finding out whether they could make it.

See how your leave program compares to your custom cohort at MployerAdvisor.com. Part 2 on maternity and parental leave is coming soon.

Sources

Mployer Insights, 2026 Benefits State of the Union: Leave & Workplace Flexibility. Source: Mployer Insights analysis of 50,000+ employer benefit plans.

Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq. Applies to employers with 50+ employees within 75 miles.

U.S. Department of Labor: Federal holidays apply to federal government employees; private employers have no federal obligation to provide paid holidays.

State paid family and medical leave programs: California (CFRA/SDI), New York (NY PFL), New Jersey (NJFLA), Washington (WA PFML), Massachusetts (MAPFML), Oregon (OPFML), Colorado (FAMLI), Connecticut (CTFMLA), and others.

Mployer Launches Expanded AI Release Powered by Anthropic

July 16, 2026

Mployer materially expands the AI and agentic capabilities across its product suite and expands access to its MCP Server and Claude Connectors, making Mployer's proprietary 2 billion data points across benefits and insurance accessible inside partners' own LLMs.


Nashville, TN, July 16, 2026 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ --


Mployer, the industry's leading employee benefits and insurance intelligence platform, today announced its Expanded AI Release powered by Anthropic. This release is a major expansion of the AI and agentic abilities already built across its products, and it includes the broad release of its MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server and Claude Connectors. This Expanded AI release allows our partners to access Mployer's 2 billion proprietary benefit and insurance data points both inside Mployer and inside their own LLM.

This functionality is coupled with an expert benefit AI-agent trained on these 2 billion data points to provide superior strategic advice and support for our partners at every step in their workflow, across every Mployer solution - from market analytics to benchmarking, claims and compliance. It is similar to having a highly educated insurance expert with 30+ years of experience sitting side by side with every individual partner at every step.

In addition, in line with the company's goal of better enabling all industry participants, Mployer is releasing a limited, free version of every product. There will be a national training on July 28 and August 5 that is for everyone in the industry. To sign up for limited free access and the national training on July 28th, or request access to the Mployer MCP, please see further details below.

"This release raises the bar for what AI can do for our industry," said Brian Freeman, CEO of Mployer. "Applying this next level of AI
across our platform and the broker and carrier workflows gives insurance industry leaders powerful, proprietary market data to support their strategies and decisions. We are entering an awesome era for our industry, where the brokers and carriers using the best analytics will deliver differentiated outcomes for their employer partners. That will continue to drive collective, positive industry impact. We're excited for our partners and for Mployer to play a material role in this next era."

Infusing AI into every step of the workflow:
Mployer's benefits and insurance AI Agent has been highly trained on Mployer's 2 billion unique benefits and insurance data points, and sits alongside leading producers across each step of their workflow, including:

  • Catalyst - Market Intelligence: See the market more clearly than others, with deeper research and AI recommendations on
    proprietary employer and employee market signals.
  • Insights - Benefits Benchmarking: Run real-time benchmarks against localized, custom cohorts, paired with Mployer's expert
    benefit AI to guide custom strategies for each unique plan.
  • Vista - Claims Analytics: Simplify manual client reporting across carrier, Rx, stop-loss, and more, down to just minutes, layering in
    expert-recommended strategies for your review and market trends.
  • Pulse - HR & Compliance: Industry-leading compliance, HR support, and content for brokers and their employer partners have
    reached a next level of ease and engagement.
  • Atlas - Employer Engagement: Extend benefits intelligence across compliance, benchmarking, and claims analytics to employer
    clients directly through an AI-first broker-branded portal.


"Imagine being a producer today and starting your morning with updates from your expert benefits AI assistant: 'Your client's renewal is trending 14% above their cohort benchmark, attached are draft strategies for your review,' or 'An HR director from one of our partners is now the CHRO at a new company, attached is a draft congratulatory email,' or 'A new proposed Texas law impacts three of our groups, attached is a communication for your review.' That is the reality of what this release and the next era bring," said Anthony Waters, Chief Growth Officer of Mployer. "It is a great time to be a part of this industry."


To receive limited, free access to every product, you need to attend one of the trainings:

Each product training is 20 minutes. You can join only the specific solutions you would like to learn more about.


To request access to Mployer's MCP Server and Claude Connectors, please reach out to [email protected].

About Mployer

Mployer is the industry's leading employee benefits and insurance intelligence platform, built for brokers, carriers, GAs, PEOs, and the employers they serve. Powered by more than 2 billion unique benefit data points and Anthropic, Mployer's suite of Catalyst, Insights, Vista, Pulse, and Atlas works for industry leaders benchmarking plans, analyzing claims, recommending growth strategies, and interpreting complex policies and legislation, in one platform. With its MCP Server and Claude Connectors, Mployer's data and AI are accessible across its products and directly within Claude. Learn more at MployerAdvisor.com.

Media Contact: Anthony Waters Chief Growth Officer, Mployer [email protected]

Media Contact
Anthony Waters, Mployer, 1 774 2879741, [email protected], https://MployerAdvisor.com