Adverse Selection

Adverse selection is a phenomenon in the insurance industry that occurs when policyholders who are at a higher risk of making a claim are more likely to purchase insurance than those who are at a lower risk. This can result in insurers facing a disproportionate number of high-risk policyholders, which can lead to higher claim payouts and increased costs for the insurer.

Some key features of adverse selection in the insurance industry include:

  • Higher risk policyholders: Adverse selection occurs when policyholders who are at a higher risk of making a claim are more likely to purchase insurance. For example, people with a history of health problems are more likely to purchase health insurance than those who are healthy.

  • Unbalanced risk pool: When a disproportionate number of high-risk policyholders purchase insurance, it can result in an unbalanced risk pool. This means that the insurer may be paying out more in claims than it is receiving in premiums.

  • Premium increases: To offset the higher costs associated with an unbalanced risk pool, insurers may need to increase premiums for all policyholders. This can lead to a situation where even low-risk policyholders are paying higher premiums than they would otherwise.

  • Limited coverage: To manage their risk exposure, insurers may limit coverage for certain high-risk groups. For example, an insurer may exclude coverage for pre-existing medical conditions in a health insurance policy.

For example, imagine an auto insurance company offers a standard policy with a $1,000 premium. The policy covers both high-risk and low-risk drivers. However, high-risk drivers are more likely to purchase the policy than low-risk drivers because they anticipate higher expenses in case of an accident. Over time, the insurance company's pool of policyholders becomes increasingly high-risk. To offset this, the insurance company may need to raise premiums to cover the higher expected costs, which could further drive away low-risk drivers and perpetuate the adverse selection cycle.

Next Up

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, known as ERISA, was enacted to protect employees from the mismanagement of benefits promised to them. It does that by imposing fiduciary duties on anyone who exercises discretionary authority over a benefit plan or its assets, from benefits committee members and HR leaders to the brokers and consultants who advise them.
The Supreme Court closed its October 2025 Term on June 30, 2026, and for once the biggest story for employee benefits is what the justices didn’t take up.
July brings one of our most substantial releases yet, with major updates across Insights+, Catalyst, and Vista. Insights+ is now faster and more efficient, with reports generated automatically the moment a request is submitted, along with real-time edits. Catalyst also gets significantly more powerful, with new AI-powered exports tailored to each employer, deeper visibility into commercial lines, and expanded AI assistant coverage into retirement and peer benchmarking. Vista makes report generation simpler and more flexible, building a broker-branded financial report from whatever benefits and carrier documents you have. Read on for the full details.