Podcast: Ford Rolls Out an Intriguing New Severance Option to Underperforming Employees

By Mployer Team
Mar 7, 2023
Updated
March 17, 2023
6
min read

Editor’s Note: To access your SHRM credits for listening to this podcast episode, click here.  

Welcome to This Week in Benefits, a new biweekly podcast from Mployer Advisor, the company that is changing the way employers search, evaluate, and select insurance advisors online.      

In each episode, our team will bring you the latest news and industry updates in the world of employee benefits. We will break down top headlines, bring you interviews with industry insiders, and highlight market trends and stories we’re following.    

In case you missed Episode 16, click here to listen and to access the show notes.    

Show Notes      

Date: November 30, 2022  

Episode Season and Number: Season 1, Episode 17    

Episode Title: In this week's episode, Abbey Dean and friend-of-the-pod Jeff Reinke (Editorial Director for Industrial Equipment News) discuss Ford’s decision to offer longtime employees with performance issues the option to voluntarily leave the company with a severance package rather than go through a performance enhancement plan.  

To listen to Episode 17 of This Week in Benefits, click here.      

Additional Recommended Reading    

Ford Offers Easy Exit to Underperforming Workers, SHRM

Ford to Offer Some Underperforming Workers Choice of Severance or Performance Improvement, The Wall Street Journal

Ford Gives Underperforming Employees Option to Take Severance Package, The Detroit News  

‘We Absolutely Have Too Many People’: Ford Ready to Wield the Axe as U.S. Economy Slips into Technical Recession, Fortune

Industrial Equipment News  

Connect With Jeff Reinke

Episode Transcript

Abbey Dean: Hi everyone, and welcome to this week's episode of This Week in Benefits, a podcast from the team at Mployer Advisor where we discuss all things in employee benefits. I hope everyone had a wonderful Thanksgiving. We're still getting out of the post Thanksgiving haze, but to help me do that, we have back on the podcast today, my friend and former boss, Jeff Reinke of IEN. And we are going to be discussing an interesting new policy that Ford Motor Company announced earlier this, well, I guess it was a few weeks ago now, but it started November 1st. So we are going to look back at that headline, dig into the kind of meat of the story, and Jeff is going to give some interesting perspectives on what this might mean and also what it could indicate for the larger manufacturing industry. So stay tuned and take a listen to my conversation with Jeff.

Hi everyone, and welcome to another episode of This Week in Benefits. We have a return friend of the podcast on today, Jeff Reinke of IEN. Thanks for coming on again, Jeff.

Jeff Reinke: My pleasure, Abbey. Thanks for having me.

Abbey Dean: Of course, always. Again, just any sort of excuse to talk to you. So <laugh>,

Jeff Reinke: Just trying to relive this Wisconsin weather from South Tennessee.

Abbey Dean: You know, I honestly am so it's a win-win for me.

Jeff Reinke: Well, hey, a couple months we can go ice fishing if you really want to get back into it.

Abbey Dean: Jeff, I never went ice fishing even when I lived there.

Jeff Reinke: Well see. There you go.

Abbey Dean: Would you actually take me?

Jeff Reinke: If you would make the track up here to do it, I would definitely take you on the ice, I think especially because you would last maybe 90 minutes and we'd be done. So <laugh>,

Abbey Dean: Okay, so this is recorded so you can't back out.

Jeff Reinke: I'm in, I'm in.

Abbey Dean: Okay, awesome. So anyway, aside from ice fishing, today, what we are talking about is some news that came out of Ford a few weeks ago. Basically what the news is, is that Ford is giving long-time employees with job performance issues, the option to voluntarily leave the company under a policy update that went into effect officially on November 1st. So what it's doing is it's altering its approach to addressing white collar employees, of which they have around 30,000 who are deemed under performers. And they're telling managers that some of those workers must choose between severance, or a performance enhancement program, and that's internally known as the performance enhancement plan, or PEP. So there's sort of like Jeff, we talked about this a little bit before, but this isn't a new type of plan. There's a lot of sort of structures out there that are similar.

But what is different about this is that the plan before has been in place for U.S. salaried workers with at least eight years of service experience at Ford? So I'm, I'm just very interested in this. Basically, Ford is giving white collar workers who have been flagged for underperformance the option to have weekly check-ins with managers and have new objectives over a six week-ish period. Or they can just go ahead and say, hey, you know, I don't think this is working out for me and take a severance check. So it's very interesting, and I wanna touch on this a little bit but Jeff, when you first heard this news, what was your reaction?

Jeff Reinke: Well, Ford's had a lot of interesting developments going on internally with the way that they're structuring or restructuring their company. And a lot of this, and they're not alone, is based on the fact of just the impact of the electric vehicle market. Earlier this year, I wanna say it was March, they came out with an announcement basically saying they were going to split the company into what they're describing as two interdependent companies.

You're going to have Ford Blue, which is the internal combustion engine production focused vehicle company, and then you're also going to have Ford Model E, which is obviously focused on the production of electric vehicles. So to me, when I first saw this, it seemed like they were taking additional steps to get their company the right size and with the right people to move forward with really going after the electric vehicle market. They've also made announcements by hopefully having, I think 16 electric vehicles within the next three or four years out on the market, which is very aggressive, especially cause right now they're nowhere near that. So a lot of, I think this just to me it reading between the lines, even though they didn't say anything specific, this was another move focused on electric vehicle development

Abbey Dean: Right and then a lot of the coverage I saw surrounding this, they were very clear that this is not I think there was some rumors going around that they might announce another round of layoffs. And so when this news came out, they were like, no, no, no, no, we're actually <laugh> trying to make sure we have the best people in the business who want to be here. And so it's kind of an interesting approach. Actually, the Wall Street Journal they interviewed someone named Liz Weber who's a management consultant, and she said quote, she's "never come across an approach to performance management like Ford's new policy." She also called it "impressive and very gracious, and a move that demonstrates Ford's commitment to supporting underperformers within its white collar ranks." So I don't know about all of that, but it is a very interesting approach.

Jeff Reinke: I think she's being very gracioU.S.there. I think this is kind of a half glass full approach. Basically, Ford is weeding out some of their underperformers, because the dynamic with producing marketing servicing electric vehicles is very different. Now, the supply chain is similar in many respects, but you've got a customer that's going to have to take on a real paradigm shift. You've got different design specifications, you've got just completely different production processes and models. Those models really depend on a little bit more automation fewer hands on the vehicle while it's being made potentially, and leveraging a lot of these new production technologies. So when you're looking at really refocusing so many elements of your internal operation, there's no way that can impact the folks working in the front office who are involved with designing those vehicles, marketing those vehicles, selling those vehicles, dealing with dealerships, dealing with customers.

All of those things are going to be impacted as well, especially because Ford has also taken steps in with their supply chain in terms of developing a lot of their own battery factories especially in the southeastern part of the country. So when you look at an internal combustion engine versU.S.a battery pack, the number of suppliers is less, the design elements are less. So that's going to impact things in the front office as well. And again, I think that's where a lot of this is coming from, identifying these underperformers and getting people in there that are going to be better suited to their EV business.

Abbey Dean: I should also say that I could not find any numbers anywhere about how many underperformers Ford usually has in this existing program too. So I don't know how big of a program this is or how big of a change but it is an interesting policy. Jeff, do you know of other automakers or manufacturers who do have similar programs or initiatives like this?

Jeff Reinke: Well, I mean, the buyout dynamic is not new. We've seen that a lot. But typically it was related to sort of time at the company, maybe certain positions that were being eliminated as opposed to them transferring somebody to a different job. They gave them the option of a buyout. So when it was downsizing or again, letting people retire early, essentially those things are not new for it to be directly tied to a performance program or a performance, for lack of a better word, rating program or ranking program. Yeah, that's very different. Typically, you would see automakers maybe being a little more aggressive depending on the type of job we're talking about now we're talking about front office folks as opposed to UAW workers on the plant floor. So that's a different dynamic too. But again, typically it'll be more about weeding them out more I think in a more democratic way. This is unique to look at performance.

Abbey Dean: Ford also clarified that the updated policy allows, they kind of clarified what you're talking about, what the actual severance payouts would be based on, and apparently it's based on, as you kind of said, length of employment, continuation of benefits, and then also career transition services. I don't know what that part means. Honestly, I think there's, yeah, I know. Yeah, and maybe or maybe there is a position, maybe you could move up elsewhere. I don't know. Maybe that's a different part of this that they didn't go into as much too but the process they say would remain unchanged for those who opt to go into a PAP program rather than leave. So they could be subject determination without severance if they fail to turn around their performance. So I mean it is it an interesting carrot they're putting out there?

Jeff Reinke: Well, it also allows them to move more rapidly. Hopefully we can get these folks essentially off the books. Part of this may also be trying to leverage the fact that there's been a lot of layoffs in the tech industry. Yeah. When you look at social media companies, even some of the more technologically focused companies like Cisco and Microsoft laying off a lot of people right now, Amazon's another one. Maybe Ford is looking at those types of individuals. When you look at data scientists and artificial intelligence people and other developers of different types of technologies, they may be real appealing and this allows them to, pardon the term, just sort of cut some dead weight and move on to get the right people in place. Again, I think this is really focused on advancing their electric vehicle business.

Abbey Dean: And that was going to be my next question, if this change signals anything to you about the state of Ford, but also just large, more largely speaking about the state of the industry right now and all the kind of changes and curve balls that everyone has been hit with this year.

Jeff Reinke: Well, it's unique in the fact that automotive, and again, we're looking more at the plant floor when I say this as opposed to the front office, but labor shortages have been real. I mean, especially in automotive, they've had a very difficult time finding enough workers. So to hear about a program where they're basically allowing those who have come up on the shorter end of the evaluation stick to leave with some money in their pocket is unique. That's different. We haven't heard, we haven't seen that before, how this impacts automotive going forward. I think every one of these companies is embracing the transition to the electric vehicle marketplace in a different way. Some people have gotten out way in front of it. Ford has been a little bit more, I would say, gradual in their approach. They've started with the F-150 Lightning, they started with the Mustang in electrifying those vehicles, which are two of the most popular vehicles on the planet.

I mean, the F150 has been the number one selling vehicle in the U.S.for 40 years. So their approach has been different, but I think that's what you're going to see with a lot of automakers around the world, seeing what they need to do to get the right people in place to really push these electric vehicle programs forward because they have some extremely aggressive goals in terms of the percentage of their portfolio that they want to be electric and the goals that they have in place for making sure the mass majority of the vehicles they produce are EVs.

Abbey Dean: Is there anything else you think we should touch on that's interesting about this or important to mention?

Jeff Reinke: Well, I think what's interesting, remember Ford is obviously the oldest automaker in the U.S. so when they do things, people still pay attention. I think geographically, it's also very interesting with them still being very focused on Detroit. They've been one of those that has not had as strong a move away from sort of the Midwest, although they have opened, they've got a big truck plant, they've got a lot of facilities in Kentucky. So again, and they're even this year, the way that they've done things in terms of the job cuts, we heard about 3000 cuts earlier in the spring, another 8,000 that were rumored this summer. But then we've seen huge investment again in that Kentucky facility where they make trucks, where they're hiring upwards of 500 or more auto workers. So I think everybody does watch a company like Ford and sees what they do, not necessarily to emulate them, but to get a feel for what may or may not work in their plans as well. So it'll be interesting to see how this plays out, and I could see other automakers potentially taking this route in terms of, here's an easier way to, again, get the right people that we need in transitioning towards electric vehicles.

Abbey Dean: Awesome. Well, I hope they maybe do some updates. I'm assuming if it goes well, we'll hear about it. If it doesn't, then maybe we won't.

Jeff Reinke: Yeah, I, and then you kind of feel bad for these folks who didn't take the initial offering. Oh, I know. They're not able to improve their performance level, and they're letting go anyway, and I kind of feel like that Ford is going to be, even though they wouldn't say it in any type of press release or external statement, I think they're pushing these folks to take the deal,

Abbey Dean: Yeah, I bet so too. Okay. Well, thank you, Jeff, Reinke, for all of your insight and expertise. We'll have to have you back on soon. Either that or I'll just come to Wisconsin and we'll go ice fishing.

Jeff Reinke: That would be wonderful. Abbey Dean, thank you so much for having me on your podcast.

Abbey Dean: <laugh>. Awesome. Thank you, Jeff.

Jeff Reinke: All right, see you later.

Abbey Dean: And that wraps up today's episode. Thanks so much to everyone for tuning in. Now, if you have not yet, please subscribe to the podcast. If you leave us a review, I would be forever grateful. Don't forget too, that you can leave us a voicemail message if you want to send along ideas or have follow up questions to past episodes. Also, something that you guys may not be aware of, but if you are an HR professional and you need some SHRM credit, this podcast does qualify for SHRM credit, so be sure to check out our show notes to learn more about how to access that. In the meantime, I hope everyone is doing well, getting into the holiday spirit, and I will see you all next time.

Thank you for listening to this week's episode of This Week in Benefits brought to you by Mployer Advisor. Mployer Advisor is changing the way employers search, evaluate, and select insurance brokers. Our intuitive platform connects employers and employees to get great benefits and insurance plans by providing employers with actionable data to easily evaluate and select the best advisor for your company's specific needs. To learn more about Mployer advisor and our suite of products, please visit our website at mployeradvisor.com and tune in next time. Thanks.


See how your employees benefits compare

Next Up

Communicating the Value of Benefits Increases Applications and Improves Close Rates

November 7, 2025

Competing for Talent in a Constrained Market

The labor market remains highly competitive, particularly for skilled and high-performing roles. Despite some macroeconomic cooling, the structural shortage of qualified talent persists: nearly three-quarters of employers continue to report difficulty filling key positions. At the same time, employee expectations have evolved — flexibility, security, and well-being now weigh as heavily as base compensation in determining employer preference.

For most organizations, benefits represent one of the largest investments in the total rewards portfolio. Yet in practice, those investments are often under-leveraged in the recruiting process. Health coverage, retirement plans, paid time off, and wellness programs frequently appear as a brief bullet point in job descriptions or are mentioned only when an offer is extended. By that stage, the opportunity to differentiate has largely passed.

Mployer’s recent survey of more than 700 companies across 17 industries found that employers who clearly communicate the value of their benefits — and substantiate that value through credible data or recognition — are nine times more likely to be selected by candidates and to convert accepted offers. Transparency and validation drive both higher-quality applicant flow and stronger offer acceptance rates.

Transparency Converts Interest Into Action

In a competitive market, candidates are no longer applying indiscriminately. They evaluate prospective employers through publicly available information, reviews, and visible signals of value. When benefit information is vague, candidates interpret that as a risk. “Competitive benefits” have become shorthand for “average,” and uncertainty creates hesitation.

Conversely, when an organization provides a clear, quantified, and credible overview of its benefits, the dynamic changes immediately. Candidates are more willing to engage early, stay active through the interview process, and make faster, more confident decisions.

  • 89% of candidates say they are more likely to apply when an employer provides clear benefit details.
  • 90% say they are more likely to accept a role when benefits have been recognized or benchmarked externally.

Clarity reduces friction. It replaces speculation with understanding and shifts the employer-candidate relationship from negotiation to alignment.

The Missed Opportunity: The Awkward Offer Conversation

In many recruiting processes today, the discussion around benefits occurs only after a verbal or written offer is made. The exchange is familiar: the candidate receives the offer, reviews the salary, and then pauses at the benefits section — uncertain whether what’s being offered is “good” or “below market.”

Recruiters often find themselves attempting to explain why the plan is competitive, citing anecdotal points about employer contributions or coverage levels. But without comparative data, the explanation sounds defensive, not differentiating. The candidate may nod politely but remain unconvinced — or worse, use the ambiguity to negotiate or delay.

At that stage, the opportunity to use benefits as a selling point has already been lost. The employer is reacting rather than leading.

In contrast, organizations that proactively communicate the strength of their benefits — in quantitative and comparative terms — enter offer discussions from a position of confidence. The candidate already understands the total value being provided and perceives the offer as comprehensive, not partial.

This is the distinction between defending your benefits and leveraging them. One undermines momentum; the other accelerates decisions.

Making Benefits a Strategic Differentiator

Leading employers are now approaching benefits communication as a core component of their talent strategy — not an HR formality. Several best practices have emerged:

  1. Integrate Benefits Early in the Candidate Journey
    Incorporate concise benefit summaries directly into job descriptions, career pages, and early-stage recruiting materials. Candidates should understand your total rewards value before they ever meet a recruiter.
  2. Quantify Total Rewards Clearly
    Provide a simple, high-level estimate of annual benefit value. For example, “This role includes approximately $18,000 in annual benefit value beyond base salary.” Quantification allows candidates to make informed, apples-to-apples comparisons across competing offers.
  3. Leverage Third-Party Validation
    External benchmarks and awards give candidates confidence that your benefits are not only competitive, but verified. Independent recognition communicates quality far more effectively than internal claims.
  4. Equip Recruiters with Data
    Provide recruiters with accessible talking points and benchmark comparisons. When recruiters can articulate specifics — not generalities — they move from explaining to demonstrating.

These practices shorten time-to-hire, increase offer acceptance rates, and strengthen employer brand equity in measurable ways.

From Hidden Cost to Competitive Advantage

For many organizations, benefits are treated primarily as a cost center — a compliance requirement and a necessary expense. In reality, they are one of the most powerful levers available for talent attraction and retention.

When the value of those benefits is communicated with clarity, evidence, and confidence, the perception shifts. The benefits package becomes part of the employer’s market narrative — a tangible signal of how the company invests in its people.

In a tight labor market, that clarity doesn’t just help you attract candidates; it helps you close them.

How Mployer Enables Employers to Compete

Mployer helps organizations turn their benefits into a verified strategic advantage. We independently evaluate and rate employee benefit plans, comparing them across thousands of employers nationwide.

Participating organizations receive a clear assessment of how their benefits stack up against peers, along with recognition materials and benchmarking insights that can be shared directly with candidates. These assets — digital badges, comparison visuals, and concise summaries — give recruiting teams the ability to communicate benefit value credibly and consistently.

Employers across the country are already using Mployer’s data-driven validation to increase applicant volume, improve offer acceptance rates, and reinforce their reputation as employers of choice.

If you’d like to see how your benefits compare, we offer a free initial benchmark report to qualified employers. Join thousands of organizations already leveraging independent proof to strengthen their talent strategy — and move from explaining your benefits to winning with them.

Winning the Talent War: How Great Benefits and Communication Drive Employee Retention

October 23, 2025

In today’s hyper-competitive labor market, the fight for high-end talent has become a defining business challenge. Organizations invest significant resources into hiring and developing high- performing employees—only to lose them to competitors offering slightly higher pay or better benefits. The cost of voluntary turnover is not only financial; it disrupts operations, damages customer relationships, and erodes company culture.This white paper explores how offering market-competitive benefits—and communicating them effectively—dramatically reduces voluntary turnover. Backed by Mployer’s proprietary benchmarking and benefit rating data, we’ll show how employers that promote their benefits will experience on average 27% lower voluntary turnover each year and potentially up to 51% lower annual turnover compared to peers.

The Cost of Losing Great Talent

Every HR leader and CFO understands the financial cost of turnover—but few quantify its full scope. When an employee leaves voluntarily, costs include:

• Recruiting and onboarding new talent (often 30–50% of annual salary)

• Lost productivity during ramp-up and training

• Knowledge drain, as institutional know-how walks out the door

• Team disruption and morale impacts

• Customer relationship risks when account-facing employees depart

For specialized or customer-integrated roles, this loss compounds. A trained employee with both technical knowledge and deep integration into your teams and clients is a valuable asset—one not easily replaced. Studies show total turnover costs can exceed 1.5x–2x the employee’s annual salary for mid-level positions.

The Talent War: Competing Beyond Compensation

Across industries, the labor market remains tight. Wage competition has intensified, especially in sectors where every dollar per hour matters—manufacturing, wholesale trade, and financial services among them. Employees are increasingly willing to move for small pay increases, unless they clearly understand the total value of their benefits package.This is where benefit perception and communication become critical. When employees can see and understand the full value of what you provide—healthcare coverage, retirement matching, paid leave, mental health support—they’re less likely to be swayed by modest salary increases elsewhere. In short, benefits visibility equals retention power.

The Data: Better Benefits, Better Retention

Mployer Advisor’s analysis found that companies with highly rated benefits and effective benefits communication experience an average of 27% lower voluntary turnover than their peers. That’s a significant impact—one that directly translates into stronger productivity, reduced recruiting costs, and better workforce stability.How We Measured It: To understand how benefits quality and communication influence retention, Mployer Advisor conducted a cross-industry analysis using a blended methodology:

• Sample Group: Thousands of U.S. employers across key industries were evaluated, each with at least 50 full-time employees.

• Benefit Quality Scoring: Companies were benchmarked using Mployer’s proprietary benefit rating system, which integrates multiple data sources—including public ratings, plan benchmarking data, and employee feedback metrics.

• Communication Effectiveness: We measured not just the quality of benefits offered, but how clearly and frequently those benefits were communicated to employees through internal channels, digital materials, and recognition programs.

• Turnover Tracking: Over a 12-month period, we compared voluntary turnover rates among high-rated employers versus industry averages, focusing on trained, professional employees who had completed at least one year of tenure.The outcome was consistent and striking across every major sector: employers who both provide strong benefits and communicate them effectively retain significantly more of their trained workforce.

What this means in Practice - Let's put these numbers into context:

• Example 1: Mid-Sized Manufacturing Firm (200 Employees) Suppose a manufacturing company employs 200 workers with an annual average salary of $60,000 and a typical voluntary turnover rate of 20%. That’s 40 employees leaving each year. Replacing and retraining them at a conservative cost of 1.5× salary would total $3.6 million annually. With improved benefits communication and recognition, this firm could reduce its turnover by 44%—down to 22 separations a year—saving over $1.6 million annually in direct and indirect costs.

• Example 2: Growth-Stage Tech Company (50 Employees) A 50-person software firm might see a 25% voluntary turnover rate in a competitive labor market. Replacing those 12–13 employees could cost roughly $25,000 each in lost productivity and recruiting, totaling $300,000 per year. By improving benefits visibility and achieving results similar to the 27% national average reduction, the company could retain an additional 3–4 key employees annually—saving $75,000–$100,000 and preserving critical institutional knowledge.

The data and the dollars tell the same story: when employees both receive and recognize valuable benefits, they stay longer. Employers who treat benefits as a strategic investment—not just a line-item cost—achieve stronger retention, higher engagement, and measurable savings year over year.

Why Communication Matters as Much as the Benefits Themselves

Even the most generous benefits package fails to deliver ROI if employees don’t fully understand it. HR leaders often underestimate how little employees know about their coverage and perks. A recent survey found that:

• 46% of employees cannot accurately describe their health plan’s core benefits.

• Only 35% believe their employer communicates benefits “very effectively.”

• Yet 68% say that well-communicated benefits would increase their loyalty to the company.

Communicating benefits is no longer a once-a-year open enrollment exercise. It’s a year-round engagement effort that connects the dots between employee well-being and company investment.

Turning Benefits into a Competitive Advantage

This is where the Mployer Benefit Recognition Program makes the difference.

Through our Employer Benefit Award and recognition system, Mployer provides third-party validation that your benefits are not only competitive—but also worthy of public recognition.

Participating employers receive:

• An unbiased benefits rating benchmarked against industry peers

• A benefit summary report highlighting your strongest advantages

• Award badges and recognition toolkit providing third-party credibility for your website, social media, and recruitment materials

• Ready-to-use social media templates to promote your benefits on LinkedIn and beyond

• A visually striking award poster to display on-site, sparking employee conversations about the value of your benefits

By leveraging Mployer’s independent credibility, employers transform their benefits from a hidden cost center into a visible differentiator—enhancing recruitment, retention, and brand perception simultaneously.

Retention Starts with Recognition

In an era defined by labor shortages and rising turnover costs, the companies that win will be those that treat employee benefits not as an expense, but as a strategic investment.

The data tells the story: organizations that both offer competitive benefits and communicate them effectively enjoy up to half the turnover rates of their peers. Recognition, transparency, and consistent messaging are key to helping employees see the true value of what you provide.

Your workforce is your most valuable asset. Make sure they know how much they’re worth.

Learn more or see if your company qualifies for an Employer Benefit Award by visiting Mployer.

Beyond Salary: How Elite Benefits Drastically Shrink Your Time to Fill (TTF)

October 9, 2025

The modern labor market is defined by choice. In this competitive landscape, the time it takes to fill a critical position—your Time to Fill (TTF)—has become a painful metric. TTF measures the days between when a job is posted and when an offer is accepted, and every extra day costs your business. These are not just abstract numbers; they are tangible losses: decreased productivity from overburdened teams, halted projects, missed revenue targets, and increased recruiting fees (Source 1).

The solution to a high TTF doesn't lie solely in higher base salaries or aggressive sourcing. It lies in your benefits package.

Exceptional benefits are no longer a perk; they are the most efficient talent acquisition strategy to drastically reduce TTF. By treating your benefits package as a competitive differentiator, you can accelerate candidates through the hiring pipeline faster, saving thousands in the process.

The compounding financial cost of every day an essential role remains unfilled. Reducing TTF by just two weeks can save the organization thousands in lost revenue and overhead.

The Attraction Phase: Benefits as a Candidate Magnet

In the crowded digital space, a candidate's first interaction with your company is often filtering for what matters most to their life. This is where your benefits package first accelerates the process.

Filter Efficiency and Signal Quality

Candidates actively use benefit offerings as a primary search filter on major job boards. By offering superior benefits, your role gains instant visibility among highly qualified candidates who are explicitly looking for employer support.

Furthermore, a robust benefits package serves as a powerful signal quality indicator. It immediately tells a prospective hire that your company is stable, healthy, and genuinely employee-first. This signals a positive company culture, immediately making your job more attractive than competitors offering standard, minimal coverage.

High-Value Benefits That Reduce Hesitation

Focusing on benefits that address major life stressors can dramatically shorten a candidate’s initial hesitation and application decision. High-perceived-value benefits like generous Paternity and Maternity Leave policies, comprehensive Mental Health Coverage, and practical Flexible Work Arrangements (Hybrid/Remote) instantly elevate your offer. These concrete; life-changing benefits are far more persuasive than a generic promise of a "competitive salary."

The Conversion Phase: Benefits as a Negotiation Accelerator

Once you find a great candidate, the negotiation phase is where Time to Fill often stalls. Strong benefits act as rocket fuel, accelerating the offer acceptance and minimizing costly, time-consuming back-and-forth.

Reducing Offer Time

When an offer is extended, a truly compelling benefits package often results in candidates accepting the first offer. They don't feel the need for lengthy counter-offers focused solely on base salary because the total value is already overwhelming.

A clear, well-articulated benefits statement in the offer letter minimizes follow-up questions, builds trust, and speeds up the decision-making process. The certainty and value provided by the benefits act as an irresistible closing tool.

Framing the Total Compensation Advantage

To fully leverage this advantage, your HR team must be trained to frame the discussion around Total Compensation Value. Show candidates how elements like a 100% 401(k) match, fully-funded health insurance options, or student loan repayment programs can easily surpass a perceived $5,000 difference in base salary.

When candidates are weighing multiple offers, the company that provides the most security, flexibility, and value outside of the paycheck will significantly shorten the candidate's decision time, often securing the top talent before competitors can react.

The Long-Term Ripple Effect on TTF

The benefits ROI doesn't stop once the offer is signed. A strategic benefits package initiates a powerful, long-term ripple effect that fundamentally lowers your overall vacancy rate and future TTF.

Boosted Employee Referrals

Happy employees are your best and fastest source of talent. When staff are genuinely satisfied with their compensation and benefits (especially high-value items like Sabbatical programs or generous PTO), they become powerful advocates. This satisfaction increases the likelihood of employees referring high-quality candidates, who are typically onboarded faster because of the pre-vetted nature of the relationship. Referral hires are consistently the fastest and cheapest source of talent for any organization.

Lower Turnover Rate

Ultimately, a high TTF is often symptomatic of high employee turnover. Strong benefits increase employee retention, meaning you have fewer open jobs to fill in the first place. Since TTF is calculated using both the vacancy rate and the duration of those vacancies, better benefits effectively tackle both components simultaneously.

Quantifying the Benefits: TTF vs. Public Perception

The impact of your benefits is no longer limited to the candidates you interview; it's public. When candidates research a company, they immediately consult public review platforms like Glassdoor. These platforms link candidate sentiment directly to your hiring efficiency.

The correlation is stark: Companies with higher public benefit ratings significantly outperform their peers in Time to Fill efficiency.

Mployer’s recent analysis of 300 companies and over 2,000 open roles during a 120-day period revealed a critical connection between public sentiment and hiring speed. We compared organizations with exceptionally high Glassdoor benefit ratings (a key proxy for positive external perception) against those with mid-to-lower ratings. The result was a dramatic acceleration in the hiring funnel: for companies with top-tier benefit ratings, the average Time to Fill (TTF) was just 19 days, compared to 27 days for their counterparts—a significant 32% reduction in hiring time. While this trend was most pronounced among smaller organizations (like local businesses to mid-market firms), large global corporations (including Samsung, Morgan Stanley, and GE) demonstrated the same efficiency gain, affirming the universal impact of a strong benefit-based Employer Value Proposition.

Companies with an "Excellent" or "Above Average" benefit rating (4.0+ stars on Glassdoor, for example) consistently report a Time to Fill that is 15-20% shorter than industry peers with "Average" or "Poor" benefit ratings (Source 2). This efficiency is driven by the immediate credibility and trust built before the candidate even submits an application. A strong public rating reduces the need for the candidate to perform extensive due diligence, further accelerating the initial application phase.

Enhanced Employer Brand

A consistently excellent benefits package strengthens your overall Employer Value Proposition (EVP). This enhanced brand, which is now supported by public data, naturally improves all future recruiting efforts by attracting passive candidates who have been watching your company’s reputation grow.

Conclusion: The Investment That Pays for Itself

The takeaway is clear: investing in market-leading benefits doesn't cost money; it saves money by drastically reducing the tangible costs associated with lengthy vacancies, high recruiting fees, and low productivity.

Benefits act as an accelerant across all three critical phases of hiring: they Attract more candidates, convert them faster, and ensure their Retention, fueling a steady stream of future referral hires.

Action Item: Review your current benefits package through the lens of a prospective, top-tier candidate. Where can you add immediate, high-impact value? The race for talent is won by the company that makes the quickest, most compelling offer—and that starts with great benefits.  

To gain a competitive edge and identify your specific TTF acceleration points, benchmark your offerings today. See how your benefits stack up against industry peers through a free, unbiased rating: Visit https://mployeradvisor.com/employer-rating

Sources

  1. Industry benchmarks, based on average daily revenue loss and recruiting overhead.
  1. Modeled data based on aggregate findings from Q2/Q3 2024 Talent Acquisition Reports (e.g., LinkedIn Talent Trends, Glassdoor Economic Research).